Skip to content
TMX Group2025–26

Market Data Calendar

Turning scattered exchange notices into one calendar view, to determine what changed, when it mattered and what to do about it.

Here’s how it came together

Overview

Challenge

Clients had to find, verify and act on exchange notices and specification changes spread across many sources. A single missed change could break their systems.

Opportunity

Turn notices into structured, filterable events with dates, their impact and a link to the source, with AI comparing new notices and agreements against previous versions.

Date of Project

2025 to 2026

Role

Product Manager, Market Data

Responsibilities

  • Client and internal discovery
  • Information architecture
  • Legal requirements
  • AI change-detection rules
  • Pilot and launch preparation

Tools

  • AWS Bedrock
  • AI-assisted research
  • Verity engineering partnership
Global clients
~2,000
Exchanges in the pilot
5
Investment firms in the pilot
20+
Launch
May 2026

Why one missed notice matters

Clients consuming TMX real-time feeds run software that reads fields, tags, message types and network channels. When an exchange adds a field, splits a feed or moves a port, their systems may need to change before the effective date.

Those changes arrive as technical notices, trading notices, specifications and announcements, published in different places.

  • Technical notices
  • Trading notices
  • Feed specifications
  • Product announcements
  • Fee and licence notices
  • Maintenance advisories
Many sources, one place. Source types reflect TMX’s public notice categories; the events are examples.

The job wasn’t tracking dates. It was managing change.

Through client and internal discovery, I mapped how a client discovers, verifies and acts on a change before it reaches their systems.

The failure went beyond clients missing the dates of changes. It also meant missed policy changes, repeated research and different readings of the same notice across teams.

  1. Discover

    Notice a change was published

  2. Relevance

    Does it touch our feeds?

  3. Verify

    What exactly changed?

  4. Plan

    When is it effective? When can we test?

  5. Act

    Route it to the right team

Before the calendar, each step was manual: missed notices, repeated research, different readings of the same change.

The client’s journey from notice to action, and where it broke down.

Treat notices as events, not documents

A notice is unstructured text. An event is structured data: the market and feed affected, what changed, the published and effective dates, whether action is required, and a link back to the authoritative source.

That model is what makes the calendar filterable, searchable and personal, which a document library can’t be.

The notice

Technical notice · published May 28

Effective June 22, the Level 2 feed specification adds a new field to the order message. Clients should complete testing in the certification environment by June 15. See the attached specification for message layouts.

Illustrative: one notice broken into a structured event.

An information architecture clients can scan

I designed the event types, filters and views: by market, by feed, by type of change, by date and by whether action is required, with a calendar for planning and a list for scanning.

A structured change model, not another library

Option A

Link to the notices

Quick to ship.

Clients still read and compare every notice themselves.

Option B

Publish AI output automatically

The fastest updates.

One model mistake becomes client truth.

Option C

Structured events with escalation

Chosen

Clients scan what changed; AI does the comparing; people check what’s unclear.

Review capacity has to keep up with notice volume.

AI that escalates instead of guessing

At the core, the product is an AI diff pipeline on AWS Bedrock that compares new and previous source documents and finds what changed. I defined what counts as a material change, the confidence thresholds and the escalation path.

Ambiguous or low-confidence detections go to a person. A wrong event costs trust, and a missed one costs a client’s readiness. I worked with Verity’s engineering team on the document comparison behind it: scanning previous and new agreements and notices for changes that are hard to catch by hand.

  1. Source documents

    Previous and new versions

  2. Version and diff

    What text changed

  3. AI interpretation

    AWS Bedrock: is it material?

  4. Confidence gate

    Thresholds decide the route

  5. Calendar event

  • High confidence

    Queued as a structured event, with its source

  • Ambiguous or low confidence

    Escalated to a person, with the passages that changed, before anything is published

The change-detection pipeline. Confidence is shown as bands; the exact thresholds aren’t published.

The Calendar

What shipped: event types, filters and multiple views, structured change events, subscriptions, reminders and watchlists, calendar export and personalized alerts.

Illustrative reconstruction of the calendar. Events and dates are examples.

Testing it with the people who’d use it

Before launch, the calendar ran as a pilot with 5 exchanges and 20+ investment firms, with an A/B test of how clients signed up and customized it, so we learned what they valued before rolling out.

exchanges
5
investment firms
20+

Sign-up A

Choose markets and feeds, then set alerts

Sign-up B

Start from a suggested watchlist, then refine

The pilot. The two sign-up variants are described in general terms.

What it changed

  1. Launched in May 2026 to TMX’s base of about 2,000 global clients
  2. Piloted with 5 exchanges and 20+ investment firms, with an A/B test of sign-up and customization
  3. Scattered notices became structured, filterable events with dates, impact and source
  4. AI change detection with a person reviewing anything ambiguous
  5. I handed off in April 2026 and stayed close to the team through launch

What did I learn?

Key takeaways

  • Clients didn’t need another document library. They needed a structured change model.
  • Design trust into AI: materiality, confidence and escalation matter more than speed.
  • The event detail is where trust is won: summary, dates and source side by side.

Next time

  • Instrument post-launch behaviour and model quality earlier: which filters clients use, which events get source clicks, and where review catches mistakes.

Next project

Open Banking

CIBC · 2024–25